Factory Snowboards Austria

The employee, the employee, the entrepreneur and the person


Given reasons that I will never understand, I'm always thinking about things that are obvious even when I raise questions.

In particular, I speak a little of what is perhaps most obvious in the world, but as usually mess me talking about it, I'd rather expose my subject.

At issue is the classification of people according to the context.

me explain a bit: In the network where I'm connected (I put your face here do not understand) the contributors we do what we like to have distinctions based on the context of the projects that we are, and that distintción between each role among project is often complex interaction between the different network partners.

In Christian: In the company I work (Put your face here "AHHHHHH, would have started out there") positions or classifications assigned by the project, which involves a project that your activities may be directed to the work trade, while another may be geared towards the operational side.

This, though it sounds a bit complicated (imagine it as a seller at any given time engaged in assembling cars) is very effective when defining highly competitive team in the organization, as each person has the power to decide largely what role it wants to have at any time.

Now, this idea is not to talk about my workplace, but the activity in context to people based on what they do at any given time.

"Dad" morning becomes the "companion" or "husband" without much complexity according to the social situation in which it is, so I do not want to consider these simple divisions.

I talk about those moments when assigning a role happens to be an assignment to a label. Here is where I roll it up unnecessarily.

I have seen many cases where people tend to classify a person, and by force of habit, directly associate with the individual classification, which means that the classification is what gives meaning to the person, not vice versa. An example of these situations is in advertising, when you refer to a product by a particular brand rather than the generic product. Here in Venezuela one of the most common examples is pre-cooked corn meal, no one called by the name above, but for "Harina PAN."

Imagine that a person is never recognized as Luis Rodríguez Díaz, but as "Laura's husband." The biggest concern is getting out of this classification, because eventually you begin to lose personal identity, based solely on the need to be classified to exist.

Anyway, all this explanation I am talking about is based on a simple question: Have you thought about all the people who try and analyze based on the classification we have given? I just think, and I really realize how little we really know the person, but worse still much to know the partner, employee and entrepreneur to me.

So I'm going to stop picking my mental garbage and I'm going to start talking to the person, to see them.